tanner, I think tk means he's at an A prestige now, which is close enough to your A+ to claim an "even" status, of sorts.The history of this, as I see it, is that you went after 2 of his recruits in (I think) the first year you were conference mates. You signed one, and he signed one. He was very angry at the time, and you kept taunting him. I must admit, I wasn't a fan of your taunts then (as you probably remember), as I felt it was unnecessary and somewhat bullying. I'm still not a fan of bullying, but I've come to see that tk just can't let it go. I remember that for quite some time, after any mention you made of the incident, he would respond, then say he was done talking about it. Then the next time, he'd respond again, then say he was done talking about it. It became frustrating that he would not just do what he said, quit talking about it and ignore your taunts. Except for him, we all seemed to recognize (including you) that the only reason you were taunting him, was that it was working on him, and that it was ultimately making him a worse recruiter.And the thing he doesn't seem to realize (at least yet) is that you have done, and continue to do, a solid job avoiding giving him any opening, by going after few players and taking 1 or even 2 walkons whenever he has significant openings and/or cash. He keeps coming back and saying he's going to extract "revenge", but I don't think he realizes the cost to him if he actually tries to execute his plan.In the end, I think he's simply taking all this personally. In my opinion, this is always a mistake. My advice for tk is to remember this is a game for fun. And it's designed to be a human-against-human challenge. And a recruit is not someone's until he signs, and there is no such thing as unfair poaching. And all is fair in love and recruiting. Once tk decides to remove personal grudges as a decision factor, and to stop getting upset when others go after "his" recruits, I think he'll become more effective.