Off Topic..Beatles Rock Band Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By tecwrg on 9/10/2009 They quit live performances in '66 because nobody could hear their music, including themselves on the stage. The fans were going to the shows and just screaming their heads off and not even listening to the music.
..not to mention, even the Revolver/Rubber Soul-era stuff was getting harder to reproduce on stage. It wasn't just "yeah, yeah, yeah" anymore. The harmonies alone on Paperback Writer were virtually impossible to hear live.
9/10/2009 10:51 AM
they grew up and toked up and their music got more experimental/edgey/mature/more complicated and/or layeredsame thing happened with elvisyou start with easy to play bubblegum pop crap that 3 or 4 guys can reproduce and then start singing about world issues etc and need a full symphony and backup dancers to reproduce during live performances
9/10/2009 10:55 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By bklynborn on 9/10/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By tecwrg on 9/10/2009 They quit live performances in '66 because nobody could hear their music, including themselves on the stage. The fans were going to the shows and just screaming their heads off and not even listening to the music.
not to mention even the Revolver/Rubber Soul-era stuff was getting harder to reproduce on stage. It wasn't just "yeah, yeah, yeah" anymore. The harmonies alone on Paperback Writer were virtually impossible to hear live. I wanted to say something about this but don't know enough about music to do it intelligently. I saw something somewhere how the tracks where laid down on alot of their music, sometimes with dozens of musicians. Also how John and Paul sang multiple tracks and then they were put together. Its beyond me but I know it cant be reproduced live.
9/10/2009 10:56 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By Primetime17 on 9/10/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By eminor on 9/10/2009
The Beatles stopped playing live in 66 and did not go back. Even thier famed Let It Be "live performances" used pre-recorded tapes.
The story goes they quit to focus on recordings but when you look at the live shows Hendrix, Cream, etc were putting on in the late 60s it isn't hard to imagine that they knew that they had been lapped as performers. The Beatles may have been more popular than Jesus at the start of the 60s but by the end they were less popular than Fleetwood Mac.My brain can't even process what my eyes just read.eminor you should quit while you are behind because you are getting dumber and dumber.Go to school or something.
The reason you cannot process it is because you have no sense of musical history. Fleetwood Mac was around long before they had women crying into the microphone. Before Peter Green went crazy they were one of the biggest musical attractions around while the Beatles were busy fussing over who got to play piano.
9/10/2009 10:59 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By sergei91 on 9/10/2009they grew up and toked up and their music got more experimental/edgey/mature/more complicated and/or layeredyou start with easy to play bubblegum pop crap that 3 or 4 guys can reproduce and then start singing about world issues etc and need a full symphony and backup dancers to reproduce during live performancesExactly! Right on the head. They started with "I Wanna Hold Your Hand", a song they could sing on Ed Sullivan. Where they went was nothing short of genius.
9/10/2009 11:01 AM
9/10/2009 11:02 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By eminor on 9/10/2009
The reason you cannot process it is because you have no sense of musical history. Fleetwood Mac was around long before they had women crying into the microphone. Before Peter Green went crazy they were one of the biggest musical attractions around while the Beatles were busy fussing over who got to play piano. Guy I have **** in my fridge older than you. I don't have to read about this, I lived thru it. I saw it happen. Don't give me a history lesson and for sure don't give me a music lesson.You sound like an idiot. Let it go.
9/10/2009 11:03 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By bklynborn on 9/10/2009http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE4HGlmtOcgOh WellYeah that puts Lennon and McCartney to shame! What genius!!LOL Give me a break
9/10/2009 11:06 AM
my point, exactly
9/10/2009 11:07 AM
So if you have a choice:Fleetwood Mac concert or Subway races ............
9/10/2009 11:08 AM
Well primetime I tried to give you a chance but it looks like all the users who sitemailed me about your lack of reading comprehension and general idiocy were correct.
9/10/2009 11:09 AM
Yeah that must be it .............. I see everyone agrees with you.
9/10/2009 11:10 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By Primetime17 on 9/10/2009So if you have a choice:Fleetwood Mac concert or Subway races ............
let's put it this way...I wouldn't race on a subway to see them in concert....
9/10/2009 11:12 AM
Disagreeing is different than being unable to interpret a sentence and respond to it. You have to crawl before you walk, primetime.
9/10/2009 11:12 AM
Well good job. It only took you 347 posts for everyone to know you're a moron. You should have claimed you were 15 years old, like you sound. You would have gotten a p***. I doubt you're 25, but if you are, than you're a moron.
9/10/2009 11:14 AM
◂ Prev 1...6|7|8|9 Next ▸
Off Topic..Beatles Rock Band Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.