I need help deciding between these 2 sf recruits any help would be greaplayer 1 ath 41 high potentialspd 51 low potentialreb 22 avg potentialdef 67 high potentialLp 54 avg potentialPE 45 high potentialFT 65 avg potential player #2ath 49 avg potentialspd 42 avg potentialreb 56 high potentialdef 35 avg potentiallp 49 avg potentialPE 35 avg potentialFT 71 avg potential

O/D and this is DII, right?

flex/man and yes D2

i'm ***uming its your SconnSt team. I have to go with player #1. He is superior across the board except for RB

thanks thats what I was thinking but those rebounds are enticing!Thanks for your help!

lots of great coaches thrive with SF's that are more guards than low post players. I like my SF's with good RB ability, but between these two choices there is no way you take #2.

#2 wouldn't be a horrible PF in a flex.

if i had the room I would take both and let them sort it out but only 1 scholly this year

#2 and I wouldn't even need to think twice bout it. To easy, IMO. Its rare to find SFS who can rebound now a days.

i realllllllllllllly like reb in SFs, team rebounding is crucial.

i would go with 1 also

well I signed player 1. I am sure I will be kicking myself every time I get outrebounded for the next 4 seasons but I am happy that i got who I got. Thank your for your help guys.

I woulda went with # 1

If you go based off of polo prediction I think you made a huge mistake. The ath/speed is similar. The LP is close, the diff in the Per is not a big enough difference to make up for that outstanding Reb advantage you would have had against every other SF. The def is and always will be over rated. I would have gave my nutt for that SF in div II with that sort of reb and to still have good enough cores and good ath/speed. He would have been a beast and a half.

You coulda took both and had a combo like thishttp://www.wisjournal.com/hd/TeamProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=3622

furrys sf is a great example of what to try for