Claim: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

Page 6 of that article shows a picture of the plane's debris outside of the Pentagon.

I am stunned about some of the derranged people around here.

this thread sux without real pics

I was anti gun before obama and will be after

hey hbdgirl

this is the PIT not a CNN talk show...if your not talking about ****, BEER, *****, being RACIST or talking about *****, then you SUCK! btw, there are plenty of cults out there that have websites about anti gun, and conspiracy topics...

hey I didn't know blackmamba was in charge here.Way to go man. Congrats on your promotion

Quote: Originally Posted By raucous on 9/10/2009Page 6 of that article shows a picture of the plane's debris outside of the Pentagon.

that's all I wanted to see-that's all I asked forthanks

Quote: Originally Posted By blackmamba22 on 9/10/2009this is the PIT not a CNN talk show...if your not talking about ****, BEER, *****, being RACIST or talking about *****, then you SUCK! btw, there are plenty of cults out there that have websites about anti gun, and conspiracy topics...

Actually it would be more like Fox since it has a really right slant to it.

make sure youi sitemail blackmambahe may be angry if something happens here that he is not aware of

I love ****, BEER and *****. Execpt if they are on a *****.

Quote: Originally Posted By fencer024 on 9/10/2009Obama lost my respect when he made the claim that he didn't understand why anyone would need a semi-auto pistol.

And you didn't answer the question either? It's either for hunting, or for playing (at best). Obviously, a police officer needs a semi-auto pistol, but why do you?

Quote: Originally Posted By leppykahn on 9/10/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By fencer024 on 9/10/2009 Obama lost my respect when he made the claim that he didn't understand why anyone would need a semi-auto pistol.

And you didn't answer the question either? It's either for hunting, or for playing (at best). Obviously, a police officer needs a semi-auto pistol, but why do you?

Why do I need a semi-automatic pistol? Because its much easier to carry a gun than to carry a police officer. Because the Second Amendment guarantees me the right to bear arms to defend myself against threats to my life or the lives of my friends, family and loved ones.Because a semi-auto pistol fires 1 bullet for every 1 trigger pull. It is NOT an automatic, where if I pull the trigger bullets will fly until I take my finger off the trigger.Because one day I might need it to stay alive, or help keep someone else alive, and its better to have something and not need it, than need something and not have it. There are only so many police officers on duty at a time and as I said, I can't carry one around on my belt. Is that enough for you?btw - very few people HUNT with a semi-auto pistol. Rifles, yes. Revolvers, yes. But not many pistols.